The proportion of Māori owning their homes has fallen by 20% between 1986 and the last census, 2013.
This is compared to a total decline of just over 15%.
Pasifika communities have seen home ownership decline by almost 35%.
The figure below graphs the changes since 1991:
There are significant differences between regions, with Whangarei, Rotorua, Hastings, Tauranga and South and West Auckland seeing the largest drops:
Home ownership is a part of the Kiwi dream, what use to go under the proverb of a The Half Gallon Quarter Acre Pavlova Paradise. Yeah this has gone the way of the American dream and dinosaurs but it says something of this economy when Maori are increasingly excluded despite festishising the so-called Maori economy...
Full report and Spreadsheets by Statistics NZ available here
This blog crosses different landscapes to pull together themes of Indigenous endurance and development within a context of environmental hazards and injustices.
Followers
Friday, June 10, 2016
Monday, June 06, 2016
And some good news from Lincoln...
Our new DVC MAori and Communities...
Dr Charlotte Marewa Severne
Made Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit
For services to Māori
and science
Dr Charlotte Severne has
been a strong advocate and mentor for Māori students in science and a trail
blazer in assisting Māori asset-owning entities to understand and better
utilise science and research to sustainably manage and develop their taonga
tukuiho.
Dr Severne has been
elected to a number of Tuwharetoa entities. She chairs both the Lake Rotoaira
Trust and its Forest Trust. She has been involved with the Opepe Farm Trust for
five years, the first three years as an interim trustee working to bring the
insolvent Trust into a consolidated position, and has been Deputy Chair of the
Trust. She worked in senior management for the National Institute of Water and
Atmospheric Research (NIWA) for 12 years including roles as Chief Scientist
Ocean Research and Chief Scientist Māori Development. She was responsible for
rapidly developing NIWA’s Māori Development Unit Te Kuwaha o Taihoro Nukurangi,
which is still a successful model for integrating Vision Maatauranga in science
institutions. She is currently Deputy Vice Chancellor Māori and Communities at
Lincoln University. Dr Severne was a Ministerial Appointment to the MBIE
Science Board in 2014 and was previously a Ministerial Appointment to the
Bioethics Council.
| Charlotte, front and centre, with whanau and friends after powhiri on her starting as DVC Maori and Communities at Lincoln University, |
Accusations of corruption
Ongoing accusations of corruption surround ex-Lincoln consultant Roger Pikia.
Seems Mr Pikia has woven a merry web of directorships and companies and has ended up in hot water....
To be fair, this does seem to be the current modus operandi for Aoteroa NZ's politico-economic elites...
Evidence of Mr. Pikia's fraudulent past surfaced when he was employed by (now ex) Vice Chancellor Andy West. Lincoln has imploded since Dr. West's demise, with four of the DVCs of hiserror era having left or about to leave. Again to be fair Dr. West opened Lincoln's collectives eyes to the so-called Maori economy and he helped to launch the unfortunately still-stuttering Whenua Strategy.
We should not be surprised that a slew of Maori consultants appeared to suck at the teat of institutional largesse. Institutional racism means these institutions are poorly placed to collaborate with an economically growing and culturally distinct sector.
We can, however, be disappointed.
Very disappointed...
Seems Mr Pikia has woven a merry web of directorships and companies and has ended up in hot water....
| Roger Pikia in hot water? |
To be fair, this does seem to be the current modus operandi for Aoteroa NZ's politico-economic elites...
Evidence of Mr. Pikia's fraudulent past surfaced when he was employed by (now ex) Vice Chancellor Andy West. Lincoln has imploded since Dr. West's demise, with four of the DVCs of his
We should not be surprised that a slew of Maori consultants appeared to suck at the teat of institutional largesse. Institutional racism means these institutions are poorly placed to collaborate with an economically growing and culturally distinct sector.
We can, however, be disappointed.
Very disappointed...
Monday, May 30, 2016
Helen Clark: Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Special Session World Humanitarian Summit, Istanbul May 23-24, 2016
|
The question for Ms Clarke was on why is tackling risk is so important not just for the world humanitarians but also for
sustainable development.
|
|
Thank you, one of the themes which UNDP run
through all the major agenda setting conferences last year was that if
development isn’t risk informed it cannot be sustainable development, at the
most fundamental level we see natural disasters either shaking down or
washing away or drying up development gains and so not to approach
development with a risk informed lens is to endanger every investment that’s
made in development and to probably set development up for very significant setbacks
and indeed for the scale of humanitarian response that is sadly so often in
call before. If we were looking just
at times of risk around the natural disasters clearly where you build your
infrastructure, the strength to which you construct it, the level of
engagement with your community and being aware of risks and being able to
participate in and help direct the nature of risk reduction, these are all
highly relevant to sustainable development but then I think the sessions are
also calling our attention to interconnected risks and I think if we look
at…what are the real risks to not achieving a goal like sustainable
development goal one on the eradication of extreme poverty, what we will see
I think is increasing the extreme poverty concentrated in a cluster of
countries with certain characteristics which will be deep and entrenched
inequalities, poor governance, risk of conflict and exposure to natural
disaster and these things all tend to of course reinforce each other in a
downward spiral to crisis so I think we need to be very conscious of the
interconnected risks and address them comprehensively and that is why a
summit like this one which is very much seeking to bring the shared analysis
of humanitarian’s development act, human rights act as peaceful as whatever
analysis, bring these analysis together and scanning the horizon to see where
the risks are. In a sense we know
about the natural disaster risk, it may not be that easy to overcome in the
year of climate change when we’re looking at worsening weather for the next
60 or 70 years but I think we more or less understand what has to be done
with these more complex interconnected risks in countries which are fragile
which is the hardest way we’ve come and sadly have seen some of the most
profound calls for humanitarian relief at this time.
|
|
A follow up question sought to draw Ms Clarke's
opinions on the future vision for sustainable development…
|
|
Well I might and address the platform just so the
total support of … there’s been a
lot of consultation go into the global risk platform and I think it can only
be a good thing but I really want to concentrate my comment on sight, if
we’re going to get risk informed development when we build and support
national and local capacities to drive that development so often these
discussions about us as developing the national development or other
organisations but development has to happen in countries, it has to be led by
governments, local, sub-national, by communities, it falls to society to
participation. I was thinking as I was
listening and particularly to …
about some of the really exciting things you see at the local level with
governance taken into their own hands to really push ahead. I remember back
in the early in the second decade of this century there was an appalling drought
in Niger, people died. By the time the
next one came Niger had taken action itself, it used to have partners
supporting them but it came up with its own programme for food security and
called it Nigerians Nurturing Nigerians, the three N’s campaign and as a
result of that they have in place an early warning system that told them that
another bad drought was coming but there was time to get systems in place and
growing the international pathways and so on. That’s in the basis for moving on to other initiatives, I think the
insurances it spreads has an enormous role to play in getting the local
products that support the small holders in … countries like it. I can
think of another example in Kenya, this is an example they did to
prices. The 2007 election was not a
good experience in Kenya, it was a bad experience but the experience was that
where the local communities and their local peace architecture because they
knew there was potential risks, they could hold in peace and that was then … next time to have a peaceful
election so my plea really is can we all acknowledge that we’re in this
business to support locals and national …
building the capacity to do it themselves, that’s development, that’s how
we’ll truly sustain the risk in formal development.
|
Many thanks to Ms Emma Hall for the transciption :)
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS FROM HUMANITARIAN SCHOLARS AT WORLD HUMANITARIAN SUMMIT
Just back from the first World Humanitarian Summit, Istanbul, Turkey.
As academics, we had a minor but not unimportant role. The following statement provides a normative baseline for future research and is signed by over 50 academics, many of them world leading scholars in the area of human rights. The first commitment opens Indigenous Knowledge as having an important future role in research supporting humanitarian action for our communities.
"The future of effective responses to
humanitarian crises depends on developing a strong base of knowledge about
current emergencies, future threats and their contexts; the populations
affected by these emergencies; and the legal frameworks, institutions and
interventions that seek to meet humanitarian needs and resolve these crises.
Those engaged in humanitarian studies, which includes research and education,
are essential to this effort.
Humanitarian studies critically examines the ways in
which humanitarian crises originate and evolve, how they affect people,
institutions and societies, and the responses they trigger. This field is not
simply about being an instrumental partner to humanitarian actors in addressing
the policy and practice issues of today. Humanitarian studies is about
critically engaging with forces and factors that create positive change in
order to imagine and achieve a different future for the world.
Humanitarian studies scholars present at the World
Humanitarian Summit (WHS) and the International Humanitarian Studies
Association (IHSA) make the following six commitments:
1. We commit to make humanitarian research more
collaborative and inclusive, especially with non-traditional knowledge actors
and affected communities, and to ensure that knowledge is relevant to policy
and practice.
2. We commit to research the impacts of the WHS - both
positive and negative - on those affected by humanitarian emergencies and the
future of humanitarian action. This research will include assessing the
fulfillment and non-fulfillment of commitments made by WHS participants; the
impact of those commitments; and the process and history of the summit itself.
3. We commit to further develop and adopt evidence-based
approaches relevant to humanitarian research. Member states and humanitarian
actors should support the achievement of this commitment by making humanitarian
research and education a political, financial, and operational priority.
4. We commit to localize humanitarian research and
education within the regions and communities affected by emergencies by
recognizing, establishing, supporting and collaborating with research and
educational institutions in crisis-affected areas. Member states should work to
remove political, regulatory, and financial barriers that impede research and
prevent the development of research institutions in crisis-affected areas.
5. We commit to improve the impact and increase the use
of humanitarian research by encouraging and supporting trans-disciplinary
research that collaborates with non-traditional knowledge actors. To this end,
we will strive to make our research accessible and relevant beyond traditional
venues, such as conferences and publications, by placing the enfranchisement of
affected communities themselves at the center of our work.
6. We commit to protect academic freedom, uphold
scientific ethics, and be accountable for the research we do, how it is
undertaken, and how it is used. We will seek to make our results and data as
open and public as possible, ensuring that our ethical obligations to the
populations we research and those we research them with come first."
David Cantor
Alpaslan Özerdem
Doris Schopper
Oreste Foppiani
Galya B Ruffer
Graciela Loarche
François Grunewald
Michael van Rooyen
Michel Veuthey
Karl Blanchet
Ranjana Mukhopadhyaya
Lucatello Simone
Alexander Betts
Dan Maxwell
Gilles Carbonier
Antonio Donini
Simon Lambert
Alex de Waal
Dennis Dijkzeul
Joost Herman
Mihir Bhatt
Julia Steets
Kirsten Johnson
Bertrand Taithe
Wendy Fenton
Kristin Sandvik
Mitulo Silengo
Lydia Poole
Ibrahim Awad
Mahbuba Nasreen
Jacob Opadeyi
Wasseem Abaza
Ezzeddine Abdelmoula
Michael Barnett
Jyotsna Puri
Tanja Granzow
Cassie Kenney
Jeremy Collymore
Andrew Collins
Catherine Bragg
Alistair Edgar
Martine Najem
Seun Kolade
Mukesh Kapila
Kirsten Geldorf
Helen Young
Graham Sem
Anna Goos
Susan Akram
Patrick Vink
Wolf Dieter Eberwein
Randolph Kent
Bonaventure Rutinwa
| With Professor Thea Hilhorst, Professor of Humanitarian Aid and Reconstruction |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)